SSDs Have Yet to Justify Their Premium Price

Sure, the technology is very promising and the concept is great: no moving parts, near-instant random access times, shock-resistant… it’s all good but, in reality SSD drives aren’t so appealing and it’s hard to see why one would pay a boatload more money when their mechanical counterpart is so cheap and when measurable benefits, whether any, are paper-thin. Last week, Tom’s Hardware claimed to have proven that SSDs are worse than classic drives when it comes to ability and speed. that week, Laptop Mag claims that

they are (just a little) better for battery life… by about 15 minutes (when web surfing, which might be a questionable test). The bottom line is: don’t listen to the hype and wait until SSDs have a proven value. Right now, all they do is bump the gross margins of the companies who build, sell or integrate them in laptops.

Permalink | Comment | Uberbargain | Uberphones


Original post by Allanda

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
Related Articles
  • Samsung Targets Low Cost PCs With Low Density SATA II SSDs
  • Intel SSD X25-M 80GB Review. SSDs are Cool Again!
  • Super Talent Offers SSDs Just For Asus Eee PCs
  • Super Talent SSDs Are Faster Now
  • Microsoft Slashes Vista Prices
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply